Operio vs Maestro
Maestro steps through the YAML flow you wrote, command by command. Operio is an agentic testing platform: an AI agent that understands your app while it tests it, on cloud iOS simulators and Android emulators and on the web, from a journey in plain English.
The same journey, two ways
Maestro replays a script. Operio understands the journey.
A Maestro test does exactly what you coded, in the order you coded it, and stops the moment your app doesn't match. Operio's agent reads each screen as it tests, decides the next action toward the goal, checks every outcome the way a person would, and tells you why something failed.
1appId: com.acme.market2---3- launchApp4- tapOn:5 id: "phone_input"6- inputText: ${SELLER_PHONE}7- tapOn: "Continue"8- inputText: ${OTP_CODE}9- tapOn:10 id: "tab_sell"11- tapOn: "Add photo"12- tapOn:13 id: "photo_picker_item_1"14- tapOn:15 id: "title_input"16- inputText: "Vintage camera"17- tapOn:18 id: "price_input"19- inputText: "120"20- tapOn: "Post listing"21- assertVisible: "Vintage camera"
- Sign in as @seller
- Tap Sell and add a photo from the library
- Name it “Vintage camera” and set the price to $120
- The new listing shows up with its photo
Why teams choose Operio
Why an agent beats a script
- 01
An agent that understands your app
Operio doesn't replay recorded clicks. It reads each screen while it tests, works toward the goal of the journey and judges the result in context, so a test checks what a user would actually notice.
- 02
Plain English instead of YAML
No commands, IDs or coordinates. Each step says what a user does, and the agent finds it on the screen.
- 03
Cloud devices included
Upload a Simulator build or an APK and Operio runs it on cloud devices. There's nothing to install or keep running.
- 04
One place for mobile and web
Your iOS, Android and web journeys live in the same project, with the same steps, schedules and alerts.
- 05
An agent that explores on its own
Give it a goal and it explores the app, checks each area and reports the bugs it finds, with a recording.
At a glance
Operio and Maestro, side by side
- How a test runs
- OperioAn AI agent reads each screen and decides the next action toward the goal
- MaestroRuns each command in the flow, in order
- How tests are written
- OperioPlain-English steps anyone can read
- MaestroYAML flows with commands such as tapOn and inputText
- Who writes them
- OperioAnyone who can describe the journey
- MaestroEngineers and QA comfortable with the flow syntax
- Finding elements
- OperioThe agent reads the screen and acts on intent
- MaestroText, IDs or coordinates in each command
- When the UI changes
- OperioNo locators to update; steps describe what a user does
- MaestroFlows need updating when text or IDs change
- Platforms
- OperioNative iOS and Android apps, whatever they're built with, plus web
- MaestroiOS, Android, React Native, Flutter and web
- Devices
- OperioHosted cloud devices, nothing to run
- MaestroYour own simulators and emulators, or a paid cloud
- Evidence on failure
- OperioVideo, screenshots, logs, expected vs actual
- MaestroScreenshots and recordings from the run
- Exploratory testing
- OperioGive a goal and the agent explores on its own
- MaestroNot built in; flows follow the steps you write
Moving from Maestro?
The Operio team will help you bring your Maestro journeys over and get your first suite running with you, starting with the flows that matter most.
More comparisons
See the difference on your own app
Bring a Simulator build or an APK and watch Operio run one of your journeys from plain English in the demo.