By role/QA teams
More coverage for your QA team, without more headcount
Operio takes the repeatable part of regression off your plate. Your team writes journeys in plain English, the agent runs them on web and mobile, and you spend your time on the testing that needs a person.
The problem
Why regression eats your week
- 01
Manual passes that never shrink
Every release adds journeys to check, and the same people check them by hand.
- 02
Automation that needs specialists
Scripted suites need engineers to write them and keep them alive.
- 03
Flaky results nobody trusts
Selector-based tests break on harmless UI changes, and real failures get lost in the noise.
With Operio
What changes for your team
Anyone can write a test
If you can describe the journey, you can automate it. There's no framework to learn.
Signal you can trust
Steps describe intent, so routine UI changes don't flood you with false failures. Real breaks come with video.
Exploratory testing on demand
Point the agent at a risky area with a one-sentence goal and get bugs back.
Coverage you can show
The overview shows pass rate, coverage, flaky tests and open bugs for every project.
Products
The products behind it
- Web TestingEnd-to-end tests for any web app, in plain EnglishExplore Web Testing
- iOS TestingNative iOS apps on cloud simulatorsExplore iOS Testing
- Android TestingNative Android apps on cloud emulatorsExplore Android Testing
- Exploratory TestingGive the agent a goal and get bugs backExplore Exploratory Testing
FAQ
Questions from QA teams
No. It takes on the repeatable checks so your testers can spend their time on edge cases, exploratory work and product quality.
Yes. Bulk import test cases from an Excel or CSV spreadsheet, review them, and publish the ones you want to run.
Group tests into suites, tag them, give each a severity, and run suites in order, by severity, or in parallel.
Give your QA team more capacity
Bring a regression checklist and we'll automate part of it live.